國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向高校人才引進(jìn)政策評(píng)估論文

時(shí)間：2021-04-29 09:19:17 畢業(yè)論文范文我要投稿

形勢(shì)與政策論文推薦度：
自我評(píng)估推薦度：
人才聘用合同推薦度：
人才招聘合同推薦度：
資產(chǎn)評(píng)估報(bào)告推薦度：
相關(guān)推薦

　　中文摘要

國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向高校人才引進(jìn)政策評(píng)估論文

　　隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的全球化發(fā)展，世界各國(guó)政治、文化、科技都相繼走向國(guó)際化，因而我們需從國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的角度重新審視我們的高等教育。近年來(lái)我國(guó)高等教育實(shí)現(xiàn)了歷史性跨越發(fā)展，正在從高等教育大國(guó)向高等教育強(qiáng)國(guó)邁進(jìn)，發(fā)展的導(dǎo)向是建設(shè)若干所世界一流大學(xué)和一批國(guó)際知名的高水平大學(xué)。為實(shí)現(xiàn)該目標(biāo)，我國(guó)各高校都在積極探索提高高等教育水平、提升高校國(guó)際化水平的改革之路。其中，被國(guó)內(nèi)外廣泛認(rèn)可的戰(zhàn)略發(fā)展關(guān)鍵因素是建設(shè)一支國(guó)際化高水平的教師隊(duì)伍，教師隊(duì)伍國(guó)際化是高校國(guó)際化的必然要求。

　　現(xiàn)階段相對(duì)于世界一流高校，我國(guó)高校的國(guó)際化人才尚相當(dāng)匱乏。為改變這種局面，中央、各省市實(shí)施了多項(xiàng)舉措，出臺(tái)了多類人才引進(jìn)支持計(jì)劃，以吸引更多海外優(yōu)秀人才回國(guó)工作。以這些支持計(jì)劃為依托，結(jié)合自身特點(diǎn)，各高校制定并正在實(shí)施多項(xiàng)國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策。這些政策是具有國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的公共政策，因而十分有必要對(duì)其開(kāi)展評(píng)估研究。通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的高校人才引進(jìn)政策的制定過(guò)程、執(zhí)行過(guò)程及政策影響等方面進(jìn)行評(píng)估，能夠在政策制定過(guò)程中有機(jī)地實(shí)現(xiàn)決策科學(xué)化與民主化這一對(duì)矛盾的辯證統(tǒng)一，能夠及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)執(zhí)行中存在的問(wèn)題并迅速加以調(diào)整，能夠?yàn)檎呤欠裱永m(xù)、變更或停止提供依據(jù)，對(duì)新的人才引進(jìn)政策的制定和創(chuàng)新提供借鑒參考。

　　基于對(duì)政策評(píng)估理論的理解分析，本文認(rèn)為政策評(píng)估是：通過(guò)制定科學(xué)的評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，選擇恰當(dāng)?shù)脑u(píng)估方法，對(duì)政策的制定過(guò)程、執(zhí)行過(guò)程、實(shí)施效果的全方位綜合考評(píng)，并給予評(píng)價(jià)、判斷和總結(jié)的行為活動(dòng)。在政策評(píng)估的實(shí)施過(guò)程中，可以針對(duì)不同的評(píng)估主體、評(píng)估目標(biāo)和評(píng)估現(xiàn)狀，在對(duì)評(píng)估方法和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行選擇和取舍的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)評(píng)估對(duì)象的某個(gè)階段、某幾個(gè)階段或整體進(jìn)行單次、多次或持續(xù)的評(píng)估。目前，國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)高校國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的評(píng)估研究工作開(kāi)展較少，取得的評(píng)估研究成果則更少。因此，本文針對(duì)上海高校（四所 985 高校）國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策進(jìn)行梳理，分析了這一系列政策的特征，結(jié)合政策評(píng)估的新趨勢(shì)構(gòu)建了上海高校國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向人才引進(jìn)政策的評(píng)估機(jī)制，分析在對(duì)高校國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的制定過(guò)程、執(zhí)行結(jié)果、實(shí)施效果等方面所涉及的評(píng)估要素，選取相應(yīng)的評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、評(píng)估模型和評(píng)估方法。本文主要包括以下內(nèi)容：

　　1、在政策制定過(guò)程中從形式維度進(jìn)行評(píng)估，考慮政策所涉及不同人群的民主性和多元利益平衡性、該政策與其它政策法規(guī)的系統(tǒng)性，以此為評(píng)估要素確定相關(guān)評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，選擇利益相關(guān)人模型為評(píng)估模型。

　　2、在政策執(zhí)行過(guò)程中從目標(biāo)達(dá)成維度進(jìn)行評(píng)估，該維度包括數(shù)據(jù)變化和政策效果兩方面。在數(shù)據(jù)變化的評(píng)估中以師資數(shù)據(jù)變化作為評(píng)估要素，選擇目標(biāo)獲取模型作為評(píng)估模型。在政策效果的評(píng)估中以執(zhí)行政策后高校在人才培養(yǎng)、科技創(chuàng)新、社會(huì)服務(wù)、文化傳承創(chuàng)新等方面的變化為評(píng)估要素，選擇綜合評(píng)估模型為評(píng)估模型，考察政策執(zhí)行的效果。

　　3、在政策的實(shí)施影響方面從政策效應(yīng)維度進(jìn)行評(píng)估，考慮政策實(shí)施后所產(chǎn)生的預(yù)期和非預(yù)期、積極與消極的多方面影響，以政策實(shí)施影響對(duì)政策制定者和執(zhí)行者、高校自身和社會(huì)、國(guó)內(nèi)和國(guó)際影響等多種影響為評(píng)估要素，選取反映該影響的具體指標(biāo)作為評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，選擇側(cè)面影響評(píng)估模型和自由目標(biāo)評(píng)估模型進(jìn)行評(píng)估。

　　關(guān)鍵詞：人才引進(jìn)政策;國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向;上海高校;政策評(píng)估

　　Abstract

　　With the development of the globalization of knowledge economy, politics,culture, science and technology in all countries of the world have to go global, weneed new look from the perspective of international competitiveness of our highereducation. In recent years, Chinas higher education has achieved a historic leapforward development, is from the big country of higher education to a powerfulnation.One major goal of the development and reform of education is to build anumber of world-class universities and a number of internationally renowneduniversities in China.To achieve this goal, Chinese universities are exploring differentways to improve their higher education and internationalization.One widely acceptedway is to build international faculty of high quality, since such faculty is primarilyrequired by university internationalization and it is completely an importantguarantee for building world first-class universities.

　　At present when compared to world first-class universities, Chinese universitiesare still in great shortage of international faculty. To change this situation, Chinesecentral and local governments have issued a number of talent plans with an intentionof attracting outstanding overseas talents to come back and workdomestically.Accordingly, many universities started dedicatedinternationalization-oriented talent introduction policies based on these talent plansto recruit excellent new faculty. As belonging to public policies, these policies deserveserious evaluation. The evaluation for them is necessary and quite crucial forscientific and democratic decisions making, flaws detecting in implementation andquick adjustment etc., all of which ensure that the policies are implemented correctlyand efficiently. Moreover, the evaluation can be used to decide whether or not weshould keep the policies running and even provide reference for new talent andinnovation policies issuing.

　　Though such evaluation is of great importance, currently there are rarely studiesfocusing on this topic, neither are the known results on it. Thus this thesis focuses onthis topic and is devoted mainly to building an assessing mechanism forinternationalization-oriented university talent introduction policies.The mainproblems investigated in this thesis include how to choose evaluation factors for thedifference phases of such policies and how to select the reasonable evaluationcriteria and pick the evaluation models correspondingly.

　　This thesis is organized as follows. First, we state the current status ofinternationalization of Chinese universities. Second, we survey someinternationalization-oriented university talent introduction policies and then presentfurther analysis. The major part of the thesis is an establishment of the evaluationmechanism for internationalization-oriented university talent recruiting policies. Ourmain results are as follows:

　　1. In the making phase of such policies, we propose to carry out the evaluationfrom the form dimension, regarding the democracy and pluralistic interest balance ofdifferent people, and the relations between the policies being assessed and laws aswell as existing policies as assessing factors, selecting related evaluation criteria andthen picking the stakeholder model as the evaluation model.

　　2. In the policy implementation phase, we put forward to do the evaluationfrom the target acquisition dimension, which consists of two aspects of data changeand policy influence. In the evaluation of data change, we propose to choose datachange of faculty as the assessing factor, and select faculty structure and quality asevaluation criteria and pick the gola-attainment model as the evaluation model.Inthe evaluation of policy influence, we bring forward to choose education, innovation,social serving and cultural inheritance as assessing factors,and select correspondingevaluation criteria and pick the comprehensive model as the evaluation model.

　　3. In the evaluation of policy effects,we propose to perform the evaluation fromthe policy effect dimension,considering those expected and unexpected, positive andnegative effects of the policies etc. We put forward to choose the effects on policymakers, policy-executers, universities and domestic and international societies asassessing factors, and select corresponding assessing criteria and pick the side-effectsmodel and the goal-free model as the evaluation models.

　　Key words:Talent Introduction Policy;International Orientation;Universities inShanghai;Policy Evaluation

　　摘要

　　ABSTRACT

　　1 緒論

　　1.1 研究背景

　　1.1.1 我國(guó)高校國(guó)際化戰(zhàn)略問(wèn)題的提出

　　1.1.2 我國(guó)高校國(guó)際化的現(xiàn)狀分析

　　1.1.3 我國(guó)高校國(guó)際化的角色定位和戰(zhàn)略定位

　　1.1.4 完善國(guó)際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策是我國(guó)高校發(fā)展的必然選擇

　　1.2 研究綜述

　　1.2.1 政策評(píng)估的內(nèi)涵

　　1.2.2 政策評(píng)估國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀